Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pager Nagger"
JackieRipper (talk | contribs) (Questioning the giant warning on this page) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
The big warning on this page seems a bit unfounded, especially the claims that sqlite is designed for one process at a time and that reads (SELECT) create locks. | The big warning on this page seems a bit unfounded, especially the claims that sqlite is designed for one process at a time and that reads (SELECT) create locks. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
Multiple processes can have the same database open at the same time. Multiple processes can be doing a SELECT at the same time. But only one process can be making changes to the database at any moment in time, however. [[User:JackieRipper|JackieRipper]] 01:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)JackieRipper | Multiple processes can have the same database open at the same time. Multiple processes can be doing a SELECT at the same time. But only one process can be making changes to the database at any moment in time, however. [[User:JackieRipper|JackieRipper]] 01:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)JackieRipper | ||
| + | |||
| + | Re: warning (moved from main page) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm not entirely convinced the crash related to the nagger. My nagger is/was a daemon written in C that did pretty much the exact same thing as the shellscript (but also checked the email address of the 6245 SMS). I have attached a crashlog to [[JetsSelfInflictedWipeCrash | this page]]. --jettero | ||
Revision as of 04:16, 3 September 2009
The big warning on this page seems a bit unfounded, especially the claims that sqlite is designed for one process at a time and that reads (SELECT) create locks.
Can multiple applications or multiple instances of the same application access a single database file at the same time?
Multiple processes can have the same database open at the same time. Multiple processes can be doing a SELECT at the same time. But only one process can be making changes to the database at any moment in time, however. JackieRipper 01:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)JackieRipper
Re: warning (moved from main page)
I'm not entirely convinced the crash related to the nagger. My nagger is/was a daemon written in C that did pretty much the exact same thing as the shellscript (but also checked the email address of the 6245 SMS). I have attached a crashlog to this page. --jettero